6 min read · April 2026

The day after England won Euro 2025, searches for girls' football on the FA's FindFootball tool spiked 196%.

That number gets cited a lot. It's a clean measure of the Lionesses effect, the moment a tournament win turns spectator interest into participation intent. What gets cited less often is what happens next: the system that has to absorb it.

Five months after the tournament, the FA's Reaching Higher update reported that participation among women and girls in England was 5% above pre-EURO levels. Female grassroots coaches were up 12% year-on-year. Female registered referees were up 29%.

The thesis here is a straightforward one: the referee pipeline is the least discussed and most structurally fragile part of women's football development. The 29% growth figure, significant as it is, reveals both what happens when you finally treat officiating as infrastructure and how much ground there still is to cover.

The numbers in proportion

Players up 5%. Coaches up 12%. Referees up 29%.

At first glance, the people behind the game are growing faster than the player base. If you were designing a development ecosystem, that's roughly the sequence you'd want: officials and coaches scaling ahead of players so the infrastructure is ready when the demand arrives.

Female coaches represent 38% of the active coaching workforce in England. Female referees represent approximately 8–9% of the total referee pool. Around 3,139 women in a group of 37,000 officials.

To put the scale in plain terms: there are now roughly 1,000 more women refereeing in England than there were two years ago. That is genuine progress on a pipeline that still has considerable ground to cover.

What produced the 29%

The growth came from a specific decision: the FA, for the first time, built a dedicated strategy around it.

The FA's 2023–27 refereeing strategy, To Grow, Guide and Govern, set a target of increasing female referees by 50% by 2026, with an interim benchmark of 2,800 women referees by 2024. The year-one review, published in October 2024, reported that the FA had already surpassed that target: 3,139 women referees, ahead of schedule.

The strategy also launched Our Whistle, a specialist refereeing training programme for women and girls, piloted at St George's Park and now expanding nationally to priority locations including Essex, Manchester and Birmingham. The framing from National Referee Manager Joanna Stimpson was explicit: "women and girls needed access to refereeing close to home, supported by a programme that reflected their community." Infrastructure thinking, applied to recruitment.

The pattern will be familiar to anyone tracking the Premier League's coaching diversity schemes. When you set numeric targets, build dedicated pathways and measure against them, outcomes shift.

What the growth rate doesn't show

The national aggregate is useful. It is also the most optimistic version of the picture.

It doesn't tell you whether there are enough qualified female referees in every region or age group where women's football is growing fastest. It doesn't show the gap between the number of officials available and the number of girls' matches that need covering at any given Saturday morning. And it doesn't account for attrition.

Women in Sport's 2026 research found that coaching and officiating roles in sport are often described as not safe, fair or sustainable for women: characterised by precarious contracts, unsocial hours, and in refereeing specifically, a culture of abuse that worsens the higher up the pyramid you go. The referee strategy's own year-one review included body-camera trials at grassroots level as a response to the abuse problem. The trials are an acknowledgement that the environment into which new female referees are being recruited is still hostile enough to require protective intervention.

A 29% growth rate on a small base, in a workforce with documented retention challenges, is a fragile achievement. The pipeline is growing. That much is clear. The question is whether the conditions exist to hold those numbers as the momentum from Euro 2025 fades.

The invisible layer

There's an anthropological reason why refereeing has lagged behind coaching and participation as a strategic priority.

Players and coaches are the visible story. Fans can name them. Parents watch them. Clubs build around them. Referees are, by the nature of the role, background figures: noticed primarily when something goes wrong, then positioned as the problem rather than part of the infrastructure.

That cultural positioning has a structural consequence: it allows the system to treat refereeing as an elastic resource. Assume someone will always ref. Assume the pool will fill itself. The FA's own strategy documents implicitly acknowledge this was the previous approach. The dedicated female referee pathway was only created in 2019–20, decades after female participation strategies were first formalised.

The post-EURO 2025 data shows what happens when visibility and deliberate strategy finally converge on the officiating layer the way they have long converged on playing and coaching. A 29% rise in a year. Targets surpassed ahead of schedule. A named programme, a named manager, a national rollout.

Women's football grows in waves. Between the waves, the less visible infrastructure tends to drift back toward assumption.

The referee pipeline is now being treated as something to design. But will this continue to be the case?

← Back to Football Thoughts
Also published on LinkedIn